ARCHIVE.ORG REMOVAL, AND Getty IMAGES CRIMINAL LAWSUITS

[AriellaGamer]

You don't support with my view, and you don't want it to seem as if your website encourages people to consult the police.

You don't want people to think my opinion is that of your website. I understand... but I respectfully disagree with the reasoning that leads to you thinking you owe them something. Surely, as intelligent people, you don't believe any of that money is actually going to the artists, do you?

Actual Damage is still $0.00, photos they claim as theirs are still technically unregistered (which means they cannot claim any statutory damage)...

Once again, thank you for the very informative website. Thank you also for remaining mindbogglingly calm in the face of all this (bleep bleep bleep - it's ok, I'll sensor myself this time - bleep bleep bleep). However, unless there's an uproar and the LEGAL system is involved, nothing will really change.

[goober]

Hi Lettered,
I wrote to archive dot org and specifically asked them to remove all archived information that they had. They did so. You are correct about Robots text file and the archive dot org. It appeared again when I removed the Disallow, which is why I emailed them to remove the entire history that was archived. I then tested it again with robots on and off and it was removed. But someone had to manually remove it, robots txt will not do that.  

Those are the nice guys ...many will not remove and about all you can hope for is the robots or htaccess to block their IP. Iterasi, domaintools and aboutus use robots.txt but of course you already know how that works.