mcfilms,
I give you credit for going the extra mile to reach out and solicit commentary from them. But I think they have no PR sense. Unfortunately, I feel they really had no choice but to answer in that manner they did for PR purposes. Their credibility is very low as far as I am concerned. Talk is cheap. They have made little or no effort that I can see in getting any other message out other than bragging about how much they have enjoyed their PicScout relationship.
I also question what the motives are for pirates to steal photos only to give them away. Sure, they might get some traffic and visibility but there is overhead to pay for to host all these free images.
If I was a photographer, I would scream bloody murder over this but everyone in the HAN camp and especially VK Tylor is suspiciously quiet about the issue.
Sorry, absent more information, I don't buy it. I am not a conspiracy theory lover but there one response is not enough for me to believe.
Getty Images and Masterfile, for all their faults, continue to have much higher credibility than HAN in my book.
I give you credit for going the extra mile to reach out and solicit commentary from them. But I think they have no PR sense. Unfortunately, I feel they really had no choice but to answer in that manner they did for PR purposes. Their credibility is very low as far as I am concerned. Talk is cheap. They have made little or no effort that I can see in getting any other message out other than bragging about how much they have enjoyed their PicScout relationship.
I also question what the motives are for pirates to steal photos only to give them away. Sure, they might get some traffic and visibility but there is overhead to pay for to host all these free images.
If I was a photographer, I would scream bloody murder over this but everyone in the HAN camp and especially VK Tylor is suspiciously quiet about the issue.
Sorry, absent more information, I don't buy it. I am not a conspiracy theory lover but there one response is not enough for me to believe.
Getty Images and Masterfile, for all their faults, continue to have much higher credibility than HAN in my book.
There has been a lot of speculation about how the HAN images got dispersed on so many free wall paper sites. Nobody's really sure and there is a lot of conjecture flying around.
So I asked them.
Here is the content of my letter:
Hi,
I notice that some of the print photographs you sell are available on free digital wallpaper sites like http://www.webshots.com. It seems like some of your artisans are posting their images on these sites and they are offered "Free" or for a very low download price. The exact terms of these "Wallpaper sites" are vague. But many individuals believe it includes permission to use these images on their own web site. This has resulted in several recent "Demand Letters" issued by Hawaiian Art Network for copyright infringement.
Although I am a strong advocate for copyright, this situation has led to a great deal of confusion in the marketplace. Are you aware of this situation? Are your artists at liberty to distribute their images through other outlets? Has H.A.N. contacted these sites and asked them to stop providing these image?
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Jerry Witt
I was pleasantly surprised to get a reply the very next day. The position of HAN tracks with what has been said here. They say they HAVE issued takedown notices (hundreds), but many in the Eastern European sites don't respond. They suspect that originally a hacker gained access to the high resolution images. Once distributed to free wallpaper sites, they spread out widely.
I invited the representative of HAN to join the discussion here and I hope he takes up the offer.