I am keeping fingers crossed tight that this thing gets overturned and is allowed to proceed with their defenses!
Recap Defenses:
entrapment, enticement, honeypotting, lack of copyright registration or fatally defective copyright registration, fraud, estoppels, illegality, consent, waiver, release, abandonment, acquiescence, recession, abrogation, accord and satisfaction, license, implied license, set-off or off-set, unconscionability, mistake, copyright misuse, unclean hands, that plaintiffs abandoned any copyright inhering in the subject photographs and/or that the subject photographs are in the public domain, fair use and/or de minimus infringement, innocent intent, that such injuries or damages were proximately caused by acts or omissions of Plaintiffs and /or its affiliates or others outside the control of Defendants, and not be the acts or omissions of Defendants, lack of standing, laches, and failure to mitigate.
It is quite convenient that VKT has managed to "register" with the U.S. Copyright Office all images that are involved regarding demand letters and lawsuits. It also Peevs me that the defendants are consistantly flat out accused of "removing copyright information" themselves or cropping it out therefore stating that the defendants have "willfully infringed".
What a load of crap!
Keep us posted Budd and thanks for the update!