Dismissed without prejudice. So VKT can file again and Vermont Woods knows this.
Anyone can set up a PACER account to get access to case documents but since I already had it, I posted in on Scribd.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/232464471/Vincent-K-Tylor-vs-Vermont-Woods-Notice-of-Voluntary-Dismissal-Without-Prejudice
The document says it was VKT that initiated it. However, I am willing to bet that behind-the-scenes, the WGF lawyers had "influence" in this sudden about-face.
My guess is trying to collect their 40% was going to be too much work, hassle, and grind. Vermont Woods put up too much of a fight for that go-around.
Anyone can set up a PACER account to get access to case documents but since I already had it, I posted in on Scribd.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/232464471/Vincent-K-Tylor-vs-Vermont-Woods-Notice-of-Voluntary-Dismissal-Without-Prejudice
The document says it was VKT that initiated it. However, I am willing to bet that behind-the-scenes, the WGF lawyers had "influence" in this sudden about-face.
My guess is trying to collect their 40% was going to be too much work, hassle, and grind. Vermont Woods put up too much of a fight for that go-around.
So I just got a notice that the VKT lawsuit filed against me by Adam Gafni of Woolf, Gafni and Fowler has been dismissed.
Pertinent questions: was this a voluntary dismissal (done by the plaintiff's counsel) or involuntary (done by the judge), and was it dismissed without prejudice (can be filed again) or dismissed with prejudice (over and done with for good)?