The first part of my story is much like the others in the Higbee forum: a letter showed up claiming infringement, demanding money, had the offending photo, etc. I have a website whose theme is drumming, and I occasionally include other interesting things. About a year ago I had a paramedic tell me about a simple home remedy for a poisonous plant, and I shared that with web visitors. I found what I thought was a public domain photo of a poisonous plant online, and included it as an illustration.
The letter sounded like a scam to me, so I tossed it. As a composing musician, copyright is important to me, so I immediately deleted the photo from my server just as a courtesy. It had nothing to do with the theme of the website, and was basically unnecessary and unimportant. It was very small, 200 x 150, but the image was stored on my server at the time.
And now for the twist. The other interesting thing was that none of the letters were addressed to me - they were addressed to the nickname of my studio, "xxxx".
Multiple letters continued to arrive, I tossed them without reading, continuing to assume it was a scam. If it were a serious legal issue, I assumed that they would have been sent by registered mail so that it could be proven in a court of law that they had been received by the correct person.
Next I got a letter from Higbee & Asso saying that they were representing the copyright holder and that if they don't receive $1000 from me in two weeks, they were going to sue. Lots of scary language. Really scary language - but you're already familiar with that from this forum.
Points:
1) In looking up copyright law, I found a site saying that the first order of business in a copyright case is for the plaintiff to issue a cease and desist order. That never happened. Their first contact was with a letter that was sent presorted first class demanding money, which I merely scanned. I don't know if the cease & desist info is correct, but one didn't come.
2) They have never sent a letter to me by my name or any legal entity (a person, a company, etc). For example, if the name of my website was "xxxx," which was the nickname of my studio, then every letter has come to "xxxx" which is not a legal entity - there's no person, corporation, company, LLC, DBA, etc under that name. At least, connected to me; there are probably legal "xxxx" names being used in the country. The Higbee letter begins, "Dear xxxx." No entity under that name has a bank account or is officially registered anywhere - it's simply a nickname that everyone uses casually, not legally.
3) In addition to all this, I believe that I can claim fair use for a few reasons: a) the photo was used to educate - to pass on information about a home remedy for people who had been exposed to this plant; b) no money was made - it is a free site, it costs nothing to view, and in reading the text with the photo, the visitor learned a first aid tip... it was therefore purely educational; c) the use of the photo had nothing at all to do with the overall theme of the website, which is drumming.
I don't know what to do. I don't want to go to court, but based on what I've said, the twist to this is that they'd be suing a non-legal entity. No legal person or entity has even been notified of the supposed copyright infringement.
Any thoughts on this would be greatly and sincerely appreciated - thanks.
The letter sounded like a scam to me, so I tossed it. As a composing musician, copyright is important to me, so I immediately deleted the photo from my server just as a courtesy. It had nothing to do with the theme of the website, and was basically unnecessary and unimportant. It was very small, 200 x 150, but the image was stored on my server at the time.
And now for the twist. The other interesting thing was that none of the letters were addressed to me - they were addressed to the nickname of my studio, "xxxx".
Multiple letters continued to arrive, I tossed them without reading, continuing to assume it was a scam. If it were a serious legal issue, I assumed that they would have been sent by registered mail so that it could be proven in a court of law that they had been received by the correct person.
Next I got a letter from Higbee & Asso saying that they were representing the copyright holder and that if they don't receive $1000 from me in two weeks, they were going to sue. Lots of scary language. Really scary language - but you're already familiar with that from this forum.
Points:
1) In looking up copyright law, I found a site saying that the first order of business in a copyright case is for the plaintiff to issue a cease and desist order. That never happened. Their first contact was with a letter that was sent presorted first class demanding money, which I merely scanned. I don't know if the cease & desist info is correct, but one didn't come.
2) They have never sent a letter to me by my name or any legal entity (a person, a company, etc). For example, if the name of my website was "xxxx," which was the nickname of my studio, then every letter has come to "xxxx" which is not a legal entity - there's no person, corporation, company, LLC, DBA, etc under that name. At least, connected to me; there are probably legal "xxxx" names being used in the country. The Higbee letter begins, "Dear xxxx." No entity under that name has a bank account or is officially registered anywhere - it's simply a nickname that everyone uses casually, not legally.
3) In addition to all this, I believe that I can claim fair use for a few reasons: a) the photo was used to educate - to pass on information about a home remedy for people who had been exposed to this plant; b) no money was made - it is a free site, it costs nothing to view, and in reading the text with the photo, the visitor learned a first aid tip... it was therefore purely educational; c) the use of the photo had nothing at all to do with the overall theme of the website, which is drumming.
I don't know what to do. I don't want to go to court, but based on what I've said, the twist to this is that they'd be suing a non-legal entity. No legal person or entity has even been notified of the supposed copyright infringement.
Any thoughts on this would be greatly and sincerely appreciated - thanks.