I like to pose a question for the legal experts in the forum. Based on my research I have come to learn when it comes to copyright lawsuits the plaintiff can only go after actual damages (lost profits or such due to defendants copyright infringements) OR statutory damages as per what the dollar amount the copyright laws allow. You cannot ask for both! However on many CI lawsuits filed by Matthew Higbee he is asking for both actual damages and statutory damages. So what gives? He’s not an Intellectual Property lawyer. Could this be the reason?