1
Getty Images Letter Forum / Hiring my own photographer and getting the copywrite
« on: October 04, 2013, 11:19:33 PM »
Hello, a while back I got in trouble with Getty for putting on my webpage a tiny thumbnail of a photo I picked on the internet. I won't do it again. I decided after that to never use a stock photo again. I'll generate my own photographs.
So I contacted a professional photographer to come in and take picture of my business and its product/service. I have a rather unique product/service. This photographer sent me a contract in which they claimed the ownership and copyright of all photos. After my negative experience with Getty, I am definitely not paying for photos that somebody else has copyright to. So I explained to the photographer that this clause in the contract is unacceptable. I said I need to own the photographs because they contain my business and product/service, so they contain my intellectual property. The photographer sent me back a revised contract which now says the photographer still owns the photograph, but I own the intellectual property in the photograph. This seems to me a distinction that doesn't make a difference.
Again, after my experience with Getty, I'm absolutely not going to put myself in a position where I need photographs for my business, and somebody else has the copyright to them. I'll be telling the photographer, again, that if they want the job, then I own the photographs.
I did some search on the internet, and found out that photographers take their copyright very seriously. However, in this case, the creative and intellectual content of the photographs that are going to be taken is almost entirely my content. These photographs of my product/service would not exist without the product/service.
Any thoughts??? Sorry about the rant.
So I contacted a professional photographer to come in and take picture of my business and its product/service. I have a rather unique product/service. This photographer sent me a contract in which they claimed the ownership and copyright of all photos. After my negative experience with Getty, I am definitely not paying for photos that somebody else has copyright to. So I explained to the photographer that this clause in the contract is unacceptable. I said I need to own the photographs because they contain my business and product/service, so they contain my intellectual property. The photographer sent me back a revised contract which now says the photographer still owns the photograph, but I own the intellectual property in the photograph. This seems to me a distinction that doesn't make a difference.
Again, after my experience with Getty, I'm absolutely not going to put myself in a position where I need photographs for my business, and somebody else has the copyright to them. I'll be telling the photographer, again, that if they want the job, then I own the photographs.
I did some search on the internet, and found out that photographers take their copyright very seriously. However, in this case, the creative and intellectual content of the photographs that are going to be taken is almost entirely my content. These photographs of my product/service would not exist without the product/service.
Any thoughts??? Sorry about the rant.