1
Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Help Needed in Canada
« on: October 24, 2017, 03:41:32 PM »
Copyright infringement is not about knowing you did it, or by having the intent to commit it knownly. If the images are being displayed under your banner (business or personal) in any capacity without proper authorization, you're at fault. You will have two options:
1. Ignore, and refuse to respond any more regarding communication regarding the issue. I've started and managed many legal cases in my career, and a letter from a lawyer in the form of a demand letter isn't the same as being served with a statement of claim. I've had lawyers issue out demand letters, and they were not retained. These letters are used for two reasons, 1: scare tactic, 2: last ditch effort to avoid additional cost and time pursuing the matter further. They're not required to give you any 'non-court' related notices prior to filing a statement of claim.
2. Attempt a settlement, and pay up.
If they do sue you, they will need to prove damages that extends deeper than saying you owe $2750 just because. There is a minimum infringement penalty you will have to pay in Canada if you lose, but damages are not clear cut. Do not waste your time disputing the infringement, all they care about is how much you will pay them, nothing more. If you're going to outright deny the claims, it's better not to discuss the issue any further and let them do what they need to do. You will have to wait until the limitation period is up, which starts from the day they acknowledged you made the infringement (use any hard copy letters or emails as proof). Otherwise, pay and settle the matter if you're worried.
Keep in mind, if they decide to sue you it means nothing. Once they have judgment how will they execute on this judgment? If your company ran the social media site they will need to sue your business, and it's extremely hard to enforce judgments against a company if they have no idea where you bank, what assets your company owns, and who your receivables are. If your company is not limited, then you may personally be liable (ie. sole-proprietorship - John Doe o/a John's Cleaners) I've tossed out many potential legal accounts because it was simply not worth the trouble to skip trace for assets, and the process to seize and liquidate. I personally wouldn't go through the trouble for $2750 unless I was trying to make a point.
1. Ignore, and refuse to respond any more regarding communication regarding the issue. I've started and managed many legal cases in my career, and a letter from a lawyer in the form of a demand letter isn't the same as being served with a statement of claim. I've had lawyers issue out demand letters, and they were not retained. These letters are used for two reasons, 1: scare tactic, 2: last ditch effort to avoid additional cost and time pursuing the matter further. They're not required to give you any 'non-court' related notices prior to filing a statement of claim.
2. Attempt a settlement, and pay up.
If they do sue you, they will need to prove damages that extends deeper than saying you owe $2750 just because. There is a minimum infringement penalty you will have to pay in Canada if you lose, but damages are not clear cut. Do not waste your time disputing the infringement, all they care about is how much you will pay them, nothing more. If you're going to outright deny the claims, it's better not to discuss the issue any further and let them do what they need to do. You will have to wait until the limitation period is up, which starts from the day they acknowledged you made the infringement (use any hard copy letters or emails as proof). Otherwise, pay and settle the matter if you're worried.
Keep in mind, if they decide to sue you it means nothing. Once they have judgment how will they execute on this judgment? If your company ran the social media site they will need to sue your business, and it's extremely hard to enforce judgments against a company if they have no idea where you bank, what assets your company owns, and who your receivables are. If your company is not limited, then you may personally be liable (ie. sole-proprietorship - John Doe o/a John's Cleaners) I've tossed out many potential legal accounts because it was simply not worth the trouble to skip trace for assets, and the process to seize and liquidate. I personally wouldn't go through the trouble for $2750 unless I was trying to make a point.