Righthaven has finally gotten around to filing its official appeal in the case against the non-profit Center for Intercultural Organizing (CIO). If you don't recall, this was the case in which the judge ruled at the summary judgment stage in in favor of fair use, even though an entire article was used (the issue of Righthaven's standing concerning whether or not it actually held the copyrights in question was not raised in this case, since it was before the agreement between Stephens Media and Righthaven became public). The argument is embedded below, but Righthaven basically hits on two points:
1. The judge erred in ruling on fair use at this point in the process.
2. The judge's fair use analysis itself was wrong
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111123/13524816893/righthaven-appeals-idea-that-using-entire-work-could-be-fair-use.shtml
1. The judge erred in ruling on fair use at this point in the process.
2. The judge's fair use analysis itself was wrong
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111123/13524816893/righthaven-appeals-idea-that-using-entire-work-could-be-fair-use.shtml