Hi all,
Firstly, thank God I have found this forum. Someone I did a website for last year has received a letter from Getty saying they owe Getty over £1300 for a tiny image on the sites homepage. They got in touch with me and I admit I panicked! I got on the phone to Getty and explained that it I'd got the image from a site claiming that the images where copyright free... It was a genuine mistake.
The woman said she could reduce the fee by 30% and when I explained that we still couldn't afford the fee she wanted proof the business accounts to see how much we can pay. I also got a lecture on how I wasn't allowed to take images from the internet and used them where and whenever I wanted
I've just drafted a letter to Getty saying that the image has been removed from the site/web server and computers and that it was used without the intention of defrauding anyone. I've ended by saying I feel the fee is unreasonable given the size of the image plus the very low visitor rate the site receives and I hope that as a good will gesture Getty will close the matter.
I have a feeling they won't.
I've warned the owner of the site that they may get more letters and even a phone call - if the call my advice to them has been to let Getty know that a response via letter is on it's way say goodbye and hang up.
I understand that Getty have to police the web for people nicking images, but surely they can just let the owner of the site know that an image is being used without authorisation and that they either remove it or pay for a licence. If they continue to use the image or are found to have used more in the future then by all means get heavy handed - but why not fire a warning shot!
I'll keep you posted on what happens.
Firstly, thank God I have found this forum. Someone I did a website for last year has received a letter from Getty saying they owe Getty over £1300 for a tiny image on the sites homepage. They got in touch with me and I admit I panicked! I got on the phone to Getty and explained that it I'd got the image from a site claiming that the images where copyright free... It was a genuine mistake.
The woman said she could reduce the fee by 30% and when I explained that we still couldn't afford the fee she wanted proof the business accounts to see how much we can pay. I also got a lecture on how I wasn't allowed to take images from the internet and used them where and whenever I wanted
I've just drafted a letter to Getty saying that the image has been removed from the site/web server and computers and that it was used without the intention of defrauding anyone. I've ended by saying I feel the fee is unreasonable given the size of the image plus the very low visitor rate the site receives and I hope that as a good will gesture Getty will close the matter.
I have a feeling they won't.
I've warned the owner of the site that they may get more letters and even a phone call - if the call my advice to them has been to let Getty know that a response via letter is on it's way say goodbye and hang up.
I understand that Getty have to police the web for people nicking images, but surely they can just let the owner of the site know that an image is being used without authorisation and that they either remove it or pay for a licence. If they continue to use the image or are found to have used more in the future then by all means get heavy handed - but why not fire a warning shot!
I'll keep you posted on what happens.